![]() ![]() The shot below is a recent scan of a film photo. When you shoot a roll and scan it, it has a nice nostalgic feel, but grain and inherent softness are a lot more than people probably would expect, unless you regularly shoot film (cue hate mail from film photographers). We have a fairly nostalgic view of film but in reality, digital has surpassed it in terms of resolution and “quality”. ![]() The main reason is that most people would probably be turned off if it was 100% accurate. I think this captures the essence of film, but not necessarily a completely realistic simulation. While I haven’t shot a lot of these particular colour socks, I have shot a good bit on film. I’m not really sure it’s 100% accurate to shooting the same film stocks - especially on 35mm. Is it an accurate representation of film? The Fujicolour 800Z style is more contrasty and a bit warmer. The looks have a distinctly cooler tone than the Kodak ones, and there is a desaturation of greens. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |